Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bible"

From WikiChristian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Mksmothers (Talk); changed back to last version by Graham grove)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 24: Line 24:
  
 
What do others think? What would you have as the main sub-topics? --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 14:38, 21 August 2008 (PDT)
 
What do others think? What would you have as the main sub-topics? --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 14:38, 21 August 2008 (PDT)
 +
 +
: Well, since no one has strong opinions, I've started re-arranging. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 08:02, 30 August 2008 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 05:47, 21 September 2008

Format

Let me know what you all think of the format I used on this page. I was trying to get it to look a bit more organized. Cpark 18:08, 5 Feb 2005 (PST)

The new format looks good. Graham

Picture

Don't be shy about changing the pictures I put on the page. If you can find something better, feel free to change it. --Mustaphile 04:14, 9 May 2005 (PDT)

Apocrypha naming convention

The Roman Catholic term for the books it retains is "dueterocanonical", not apocrypha. The former term is more appropriate because (1) it is the terminology used by the Church and (2) apocrypha has negative connotations as it relates to the debate between the Hebrew and Greek traditions. V/r AmericanCatholic

Sub-topics

I think it would be good to simplify the sub-topics in the contents box on the side. I'm thinking that these might be some good sub-topics

What do others think? What would you have as the main sub-topics? --Graham grove 14:38, 21 August 2008 (PDT)

Well, since no one has strong opinions, I've started re-arranging. --Graham grove 08:02, 30 August 2008 (PDT)