Difference between revisions of "Inclusivism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Category:Religions) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {{Infobox_Contents | | |
| − | == | + | topic_name = Religious inclusivism | |
| + | subtopics = [[Pluralism]], [[Exclusivism]] | | ||
| + | opinion_pieces = {{short_opinions}} | | ||
| + | }} | ||
Inclusivism asserts that while one set of beliefs is absolutely true, other sets of beliefs are at least partially true. It stands in contrast to [[exclusivism]], which asserts that only one way is true and all others are in error, and religious [[pluralism]], which asserts that all beliefs are equally valid within a believer's particular context. | Inclusivism asserts that while one set of beliefs is absolutely true, other sets of beliefs are at least partially true. It stands in contrast to [[exclusivism]], which asserts that only one way is true and all others are in error, and religious [[pluralism]], which asserts that all beliefs are equally valid within a believer's particular context. | ||
| − | == | + | ===Arguments for and against=== |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | {{stub}} | |
| − | == | + | ==Quotes== |
==Links== | ==Links== | ||
| Line 39: | Line 33: | ||
* [http://www.christianitytoday.com/global/printer.html?/ct/2005/010/29.88.html Salvation sans Jesus], by [[J.I. Packer]] | * [http://www.christianitytoday.com/global/printer.html?/ct/2005/010/29.88.html Salvation sans Jesus], by [[J.I. Packer]] | ||
| − | {{returnto}} [[Christian doctrine and debates]] | + | {{returnto}} [[Christianity]] -> [[Christian doctrine and debates]] |
| + | |||
[[Category:Religions]] | [[Category:Religions]] | ||
Revision as of 19:20, 13 July 2008
| Religious inclusivism | |
| RELATED TOPICS | |
| SERMONS, ESSAYS AND OPINIONS |
|
| CONTENTS | Contents |
Inclusivism asserts that while one set of beliefs is absolutely true, other sets of beliefs are at least partially true. It stands in contrast to exclusivism, which asserts that only one way is true and all others are in error, and religious pluralism, which asserts that all beliefs are equally valid within a believer's particular context.
Arguments for and against
This article is a stub. You can help WikiChristian by expanding it. For help please read the WikiChristian Tutorial and our writing guide.
Quotes
Links
- Theopedia - Inclusivism
- Who in Hell?, by John Wilson
- Ramke, as told by William Carey
- Is There a Reformed Way to Get the Benefits of the Atonement to "Those Who Have Never Heard?" (PDF), by R. Todd Mangum
- The Perennial Debate, by John Sanders
- "For All Find What They Truly Seek": C. S. Lewis and Religious Inclusivism, by James F. Sennett
- Bare Bones Inclusivism: Exorcising the Demons of a Debate, by James F. Sennett
- Bare Bones Inclusivism and the Implications of Romans 1, by James F. Sennett
- None Dare Call It Treason: Is an Inclusivist a Paul Revere or a Benedict Arnold? (PDF), by Ken Keathley
- Holding Out Hope for Heaven, by Bill Haley - "If God allows more people into heaven than I might expect, will I be upset? No! I’ll rejoice."
- A Biblical Concept of a Just God, by Robert L. Brush
- a review of No Other Name: An Investigation into the Destiny of the Unevangelized, John Sanders, by Edward Fudge
- Billy Graham and Inclusivism, by Ochuk
- The 'Very Pernicious and Detestable' Doctrine of Inclusivism, by Robert Reymond
- Responses to Universalism and Inclusivism, The Southern Baptist Journal of Theology, Vol. 2, No. 2, Summer 1998
- How Wide is the Narrow Road?, by Steve Camp
- Inclusivism: The fate of those who never hear, by Dan Musick
- Salvation sans Jesus, by J.I. Packer
Return to Christianity -> Christian doctrine and debates
