Difference between revisions of "Aramaic primacy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Graham grove (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | ''Synopsis:'' [[Aramaic]] Primacy is the theory that the [[New Testament]] and / or its sources were originally written in the Aramaic language, and not [[Koine Greek]] as is generally believed. The [[Assyrian Church of the East]] and other Aramaic speaking churches have historically claimed the Aramaic Peshitta was the original language [[New Testament]]. | |
| − | |||
| − | + | ---- | |
| − | + | __TOC__ | |
| − | + | {{topics}} | |
{{opinions}} | {{opinions}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Main article== | ==Main article== | ||
| Line 15: | Line 12: | ||
===Arguments for and against=== | ===Arguments for and against=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Quotes== | ||
==Links== | ==Links== | ||
Revision as of 00:01, 8 October 2007
Synopsis: Aramaic Primacy is the theory that the New Testament and / or its sources were originally written in the Aramaic language, and not Koine Greek as is generally believed. The Assyrian Church of the East and other Aramaic speaking churches have historically claimed the Aramaic Peshitta was the original language New Testament.
Contents
Related topics
Comments, Personal Articles, Studies and Sermons
Aramaic primacy (discussion) (For short comments and opinions)
Main article
Aramaic Primacists believe that the New Testament and/or its sources were originally written in the Aramaic language, not Koine Greek as is generally believed. The Assyrian Church of the East and other Aramaic speaking churches have historically claimed the Aramaic Peshitta was the original language New Testament.
Arguments for and against
Quotes
Links
Return to Aramaic
