|
|
| Line 7: |
Line 7: |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| − | '''God''' is a term referring to the concept of a supreme being, generally believed to be ruler or [[Creator God|creator]] of, and/or [[immanent]] within, the [[universe]]. The concept of a singular God is characteristic of [[monotheism]], but it is not always possible to draw a sharp distinction between some forms of monotheism and some forms of [[polytheism]] (see also [[henotheism]]).
| + | [[Notes about different understandings of God (extracts from Wikipedia)]] |
| − | | |
| − | Some concepts of God may include [[anthropomorphic]] attributes, while others hold it impossible or [[blasphemy|blasphemous]] to imagine God in any physical form. Some hold that God is necessarily [[morality|morally]] good (see [[summum bonum]]). Others feel that God is beyond the understanding of human morality. [[Negative theology]] argues that no true statements about attributes of God may be made at all, and some hold God to be beyond the understanding of humanity altogether. Some mystical traditions ascribe limits to God's powers, arguing that God's supreme nature leaves no room for spontaneity.
| |
| − | | |
| − | A singular God is necessarily unique (but see [[Trinity]], [[Dualism]]). Still, different traditions and understandings of the concept may cause disagreement among believers regarding the God revered by others. Belief in a single God may give rise to concepts of [[absolute morality]], and also to a claim of exclusivity (see [[Chosen people]]).
| |
| − | | |
| − | Some espouse an exclusionist view, seeing the God venerated by others with different beliefs as inferior or nonexistent. Others hold an inclusionist view, assuming the God venerated by others to be the same God under a different name. Many people hold personal, sometimes even [[secular]] interpretations of God, typically in agreement with a concept of an "[[Absolute Infinite]]".
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Etymology ==
| |
| − | Earliest attestation of the Germanic word in the [[6th century]] [[Codex Argenteus]] ([[Matthew]] 5:9)]]
| |
| − | The word ''God'' continues [[Old English]]/[[Germanic languages|Germanic]] ''god'' (''guþ, gudis'' in [[Gothic]], ''Gott'' in modern [[German language|German]]). The original meaning and [[etymology]] of the Germanic word ''god'' have been hotly disputed, though most agree to a reconstructed [[Proto-Indo-European]] form ''*ǵhutóm'', which is a passive perfect participle from the root ''*ǵhu-'', which likely meant "[[libation]]", "[[sacrifice]]". Compare:-
| |
| − | * [[Vedic]] [[Sanskrit]] ''hu-'' = "to sacrifice".
| |
| − | * [[Greek]] ''khu-'', ''kheu-'' = "to pour".
| |
| − | * Common [[Germanic]] strong verb ''geutan'' ([[Anglo-Saxon]] ''gēotan'') = "to pour", English ''[[ingot|in-got]]''.
| |
| − | <br>The connection between these meanings is likely via the meaning "pour a [[libation]]".
| |
| − | <br>Another possible meaning of ''*ǵhutóm'' is "invocation", related to [[Sanskrit]] ''hūta''.
| |
| − | | |
| − | The word ''God'' was used to represent Greek ''theos'', Latin ''deus'' in Bible translations, first in the Gothic translation of the New Testament by [[Ulfilas]].
| |
| − | | |
| − | Also some people in the world, mainly Hindu, believe that the word God, is actually an acronym(G.O.D.). The acronym stands for Generator, Observer/Operator, Destroyer. This belief although rare, is held quite dearly by some people.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Capitalisation===
| |
| − | [[KJV]] of [[1611]] ([[Psalms]] 23:1,2): Occurrence of "<font style="font-variant:small-caps">Lord</font>" (and "God" in the heading)]]
| |
| − | The development of English orthography was dominated by [[Christianity|Christian]] texts. Capitalised "God" was first used to refer to the Judeo-Christian concept, and may now signify any monotheistic conception of God, including the translation of the [[Arabic language|Arabic]] ''[[Allah]]''.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | In early English bibles, the [[Tetragrammaton]] was rendered in capitals: "IEHOUAH" in [[William Tyndale]]'s version of [[1525]]. The [[KJV|King James Version]] of [[1611]] renders
| |
| − | *''[[YHWH]]'' as "The <font style="font-variant:small-caps">Lord</font>"
| |
| − | *''[[Elohim]]'' as "God"
| |
| − | *''Adonay YHWH'' and ''Adonay Elohim'' as "<font style="font-variant:small-caps">Lord</font> God"
| |
| − | *''kurios ho theos'' as "<font style="font-variant:small-caps">Lord</font> God" (in the [[New Testament]])
| |
| − | | |
| − | The use of capitalisation, like for a proper noun, has persisted, to disambiguate the concept of a singular ''God'' from [[pagan]] deities, or, in the Christian view, false [[idol]]s, for which lowercase ''god'' was continued to be applied, mirroring the use of Latin ''deus''. Pronouns referring to God are also often capitalised, and traditionally in the masculine [[gender (grammar)|gender]], i. e. "He", "His" etc.
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Names of God ==
| |
| − | ''See main article'': [[Names of God]].
| |
| − | | |
| − | The generic term ''God'' is the proper English name used for the deity of [[Monotheism|monotheistic]] faiths. Different names for God exist within different religious traditions.
| |
| − | | |
| − | * [[Allah]]—[[Islam]]/[[Arabic language|Arabic]]. See also the [[Ninety-nine names of Allah]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | * [[Jehovah]], [[Yahweh]] (based on the Hebrew name ''YHVH'' (יהוה) and [[Elohim]] are some of the names used for God in the Christian [[Bible]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | * See [[The name of God in Judaism]] for Jewish names of God. (Note: when written or typed as a proper noun, some observant Jews will use the form "G-d" so that "the written name of God cannot be desecrated". Some Orthodox Jews consider this inappropriate because English is not the Holy Language.)
| |
| − | | |
| − | * The [[Trinity|Holy Trinity]] (meaning The Father, the Son ([[Jesus]] [[Christ]]), and the [[Holy Spirit]]/"[[Holy Ghost]]") - A name used primarily in [[Catholicism|Catholic]] and [[Eastern Orthodox]] prayers and liturgy.
| |
| − | | |
| − | * Most [[Hindu]]s worship the personal form of God or [[Saguna Brahman]], or [[Hindu trinity]], as [[Vishnu]], [[Shiva]], or directly as [[Brahman]] through the [[Gayatri mantra]]. A common prayer for Hindus is the [[Vishnu sahasranama]], which is a hymn describing the one thousand names of God.
| |
| − | | |
| − | * [[Sikhs]] worship God with the name [[Waheguru]].
| |
| − | | |
| − | *[[Jah]] is the name of God in [[Rastafarianism]].
| |
| − | | |
| − | * Some churches ([[United Church of Canada]], [[Religious Science]]) are using "the One" alongside "God" as a more gender-neutral way of referring to God (See also [[Oneness]]).
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==History of monotheism==
| |
| − | ''See also [[monotheism]].''
| |
| − | | |
| − | The religions widely thought of as monotheistic today are of relatively recent origin historically, although Eastern religions (notably religions of [[China]] and [[India]]) that have concepts of [[pantheism]] are difficult to classify along [[Western world|Western]] notions of monotheism versus polytheism, and sometimes have claims of being very ancient, if not eternal.
| |
| − | | |
| − | In the [[Ancient Orient]], many cities had their own local god, but this [[henotheistic]] worship of a single god did not imply denial of the existence of other gods. The [[Hebrew]] [[Ark of the Covenant]] adapted this practice to a [[nomad]]ic lifestyle, paving their way for a singular God. The cult of the solar god [[Aten]] is often cited as the earliest known example of monotheism, but even if [[Akhetaten]]'s [[Great Hymn to the Aten|hymn to Aten]] praises this god as omnipotent creator, worship of other gods beside him never ceased. Early examples of monotheism also include two late [[rigveda|rigvedic]] hymns (10.129,130) to a [[Panentheistic]] [[creator god]], [[Shri Rudram]], a [[Vedic]] hymn to [[Rudra]], an earlier aspect of [[Shiva]], which expressed [[monistic theism]], and is still chanted today, the [[Zoroastrian]] [[Ahuramazda]] and [[China|Chinese]] [[Shang Ti]]. The worship of polytheistic gods, on the other hand, is seen by many to predate monotheism, reaching back as far as the [[paleolithic]]. Today, monotheistic religions are dominant (mainly due to the missionary efforts of [[Christianity]] and [[Islam]]), but polytheism, and to a lesser extent also [[animism]], survive.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==The existence of God ==
| |
| − | ''See also [[arguments for the existence of God|arguments for]] and [[arguments against the existence of God|arguments against]] the existence of God.''
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Arguments for God===
| |
| − | Arguments for or against the existence of God date back to classical times.
| |
| − | | |
| − | *'''[[Ontological argument]]s''' argue God exists by necessity or definition - that God's existence can be determined from consideration of his, her, or its nature alone.
| |
| − | | |
| − | *'''[[Cosmological argument]]s''' contend that the existence of the universe is contingent upon the existence of God.
| |
| − | | |
| − | *'''[[Teleological argument]]s''' argue that the structure of aspects of the [[Cosmos]], such that the high level of complexity seen in the universe or the apparent fine-tuning of physical constants, require a divine designer.
| |
| − | | |
| − | *'''[[Argument from morality|Arguments from morality]]''' contend that the existence of 'good' and 'evil' imply the existence of God.
| |
| − | | |
| − | A more comprehensive list of such arguments can be found in [[Arguments for the existence of God]].
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Arguments against God===
| |
| − | Alternately, there are a variety of [[arguments against the existence of God]].
| |
| − | | |
| − | *The '''[[problem of evil]]''' argues that gratuitous suffering is inconsistent with an [[Omnipotence|omnipotent]] but [[Benevolence|benevolent]] God.
| |
| − | | |
| − | *The '''[[Argument from Inconsistent Revelations|argument from inconsistent revelations]]''' argues the diversity of different religious beliefs makes the 'truth' of any particular viewpoint on God highly improbable.
| |
| − | | |
| − | *'''[[Incompatible-properties arguments]]''' contend that many of the properties often assigned to God are logically inconsistent with each other.
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Some [[atheist]]ic arguments follow a '''[[burden of proof]]''' line of reasoning, claiming that the existence of a God is an extraordinary claim that should be rejected until proven otherwise by a preponderance of empirical evidence.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Fideism===
| |
| − | [[Fideism]] maintains that all attempted proofs and disproofs of God's existence are misguided, as belief in God must depend on [[faith]] rather than any rational arguments or proofs. This argument makes the existence of God a spiritual "question" as opposed to an intellectual one. Fideists often quote [[scripture]] as support for their claim, such as [[wikisource:Bible, English, King James, Hebrews#Chapter 11|Hebrews 11:6]].
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Theology==
| |
| − | [[Theology]] is the study of religious beliefs. Theologians attempt to explicate (and in some cases systematize) beliefs; some express their own experience of the divine. Theologians ask questions such as: What is the nature of God? What does it mean for God to be singular? If people believe in God as a duality or trinity, what do these terms signify? Is God [[transcendent]], [[immanent]], or some mix of the two? What is the relationship between God and the universe, and God and mankind?
| |
| − | | |
| − | * [[Theism]] holds that God is both [[transcendent]] and [[immanent]]; thus, God is simultaneously infinite and in some way present in the affairs of the world. Catholic theology holds that God is [[divine simplicity|infinitely simple]] and is [[eternity|outside of time]]. Most theists hold that God is omnipotent, omniscient, and benevolent, although this belief raises questions about God's responsibility for evil and suffering in the world. Some theists ascribe to God a self-conscious or purposeful limiting of omnipotence, omniscience, or benevolence. [[Open Theism]], by contrast, asserts that God has limits. A few people use the word "monotheism" to refer to the belief in God and use "theism" to refer to any belief in gods, i.e., monotheism or polytheism.
| |
| − | | |
| − | * [[Deism]] holds that God is wholly transcendent: God exists, but does not intervene in the world beyond what was necessary for God to create it. In this view, God is not [[anthropomorphic]], and does not literally answer prayers or cause [[miracle]]s to occur.
| |
| − | | |
| − | * [[Monotheism]] holds that there is only one God, and/or that the one true God is worshipped in different religions under different names. It is important to note, however, that monotheists of one religion can, and often do, consider the monotheistic god of a different religion to be a false god. For instance, many Christian fundamentalists consider the God of Islam ([[Allah]]) to be a false god or [[demon]] (although theologians and linguists argue that "Allah" is merely the Arabic word for "God," and not the literal name of a specifically Muslim god). Many Jews consider the [[messiah]] of Christianity ([[Jesus]]) to be a false god and some monotheists (notably fundamentalist Christians) hold that there is one [[triune]] God, and that all gods of other religions are actually demons in disguise (as in [http://wikisource.org/wiki/Bible%2C_English%2C_King_James%2C_2_Corinthians#Chapter_11 2nd Corinthians 11] verse 14). Eastern religious believers and [[Liberal Christian]]s are more likely to assume those of other faiths worship the same God as they.
| |
| − | | |
| − | * [[Pantheism]] holds that God is the universe and the universe is God. [[Panentheism]] holds that God contains, but is not identical to, the Universe. The distinctions between the two are subtle, and many consider them unhelpful. [[Kabbalah]], Jewish mysticism, paints a [[pantheistic]]/[[panentheism|panentheistic]] view of God, which has wide acceptance in [[Hasidic Judaism]], particularly from their founder [[Israel ben Eliezer|The Baal Shem Tov]]. It is also the view of the [[Liberal Catholic Church]], [[Theosophy]], [[Cosmotheism]], [[Hinduism]], some divisions of [[Buddhism]], and [[Taoism]], along with many varying denomintions and individuals within denominations.
| |
| − | | |
| − | * [[Dystheism]] is a form of theism which holds that God is malevolent as a consequence of the [[problem of evil]]. Dystheistic speculation is common in theology, but there is no known church of practicing dystheists. See also [[Satanism]].
| |
| − | | |
| − | Most believers allow for the existence of other, less powerful spiritual beings, and give them names such as [[angel]]s, [[saint]]s, [[Djinn]], [[demon]]s, and [[devas]].
| |
| − | ==== Biblical definition of God ====
| |
| − | [[16th century]] Christian view of [[Genesis]]: God creates [[Adam]] ([[Michelangelo]], [[Sistine Chapel]])]]
| |
| − | The [[Hebrew Bible]] ([[Old Testament]]) characterizes God by these attributes: "The Lord, the Lord, a God merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness, keeping steadfast love for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, but who will by no means clear the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children and the children's children, to the third and the fourth generation." (Exodus 34:6–7)
| |
| − | | |
| − | The Hebrew Bible contains no systematic theology: No attempt is made to give a [[Philosophy|philosophical]] or rigorous definition of God, nor of how God acts in the world. It does not explicitly describe God's nature, exemplified by God's assertion in [[Exodus]] that "you cannot see my face; for man shall not see me and live". Nowhere in the Hebrew Bible are the words [[omnipotent]], [[omniscient]], or [[omnibenevolent]] used to define God in a systematic sense.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Although scripture does not describe God systematically, however, it does provide a poetic depiction of God and His relationship with people. According to the biblical historian [[Yehezkal Kaufmann]], the essential innovation of Biblical theology was to posit a God that cares about people, and that cares about whether people care about Him. Most people believe that the Bible should be viewed as humanity's view of God, but theologian [[Abraham Joshua Heschel]] described the Biblical God as "anthropopathic", which means that one should read the Bible as God's view of humanity, and not as humanity's view of God.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Similarly, the [[New Testament]] contains no systematic theology: no attempt is made to give a philosophical or rigorous definition of God, nor of how God acts in the world. The New Testament does, however, provide an implicit theology as it teaches that God became human while remaining fully God, in the person of [[Jesus]], and that he subsequently sent the [[Holy Spirit]]. In this view, God becomes someone that can be seen and touched, and may speak and act in a manner easily perceived by humans, while also remaining transcendent and invisible. This appears to be a radical departure from the concepts of God found in Hebrew Bible. The New Testament's statements regarding the nature of God were eventually developed into the doctrine of the [[Trinity]].
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Conceptions of God ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Jewish, Christian and Muslim conceptions===
| |
| − | [[Judaism]], [[Christianity]] and [[Islam]] see God as a being who created the world and rules over the universe. God is usually held to have the properties of [[holiness]] (separate from sin and incorruptible), [[Justice|justness]] (fair, right, and true in all His judgements), [[sovereignty]] (unthwartable in His will), [[omnipotence]] (all-powerful), [[omniscience]] (all-knowing), [[omnibenevolence]] (all-loving), and [[omnipresence]] (all-present).
| |
| − | | |
| − | Jews, Christians and Muslims often conceive of God as a ''personal'' God, with a will and personality. However, many medieval [[rationalist]] philosophers of these religions felt that one should not view God as personal, and that such personal descriptions of God are only meant as [[metaphor]]s. Some within these three faiths still accept these views as valid, although many of the [[laity]] today do not have a wide awareness of them.
| |
| − | | |
| − | In [[Eastern Christianity]], it remains essential that God be personal; hence it speaks of the three ''persons'' of the [[Trinity]]. It also emphasizes that God has a will, and that God the Son has two wills, divine and human, though these are never in conflict. The personhood of God and of all human people is essential to the concept of [[theosis]] or deification.
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | == References ==
| |
| − | * [[Karen Armstrong]], <cite>A History of God: The 4,000-Year Quest of Judaism, Christianity and Islam</cite>, Ballantine Books, 1994
| |
| − | * [[Jack Miles]], <cite>God : A Biography</cite>, Knopf, 1995. [http://www.jackmiles.com/default.asp?ID=15]
| |
| − | * [[Cliff Pickover]], <cite>The Paradox of God and the Science of Omniscience</cite>, Palgrave/St Martin's Press, 2001.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==See also==
| |
| − | *[[Arguments against the existence of God]]
| |
| − | *[[Arguments for the existence of God]]
| |
| − | *[[Consciousness]]
| |
| − | *[[God and gender]]
| |
| − | *[[God realm]]
| |
| − | *[[Cults and other religions|Major world religions]]
| |
| − | *[[Natural theology]]
| |
| − | *[[Higgs boson|The Higgs boson, ''the God particle'']]
| |
| − | | |
| − | == External links==
| |
| − | *[http://www.idsia.ch/~juergen/computeruniverse.html God as a 'Great Programmer']
| |
| − | *[http://www.logon.org/english/S/p220.html The Etymology of the Name of God]
| |
| − | *[http://www.freewebs.com/thegodparticle/ ''The God Particle'' by Joel Schlecht]
| |
| − | *[http://swami-center.org/en/chpt/heart/page_7.shtml What Is God]
| |
| − | *[http://www.AllAboutGOD.com/does-God-exist.htm Does God Exist?]
| |
| − | *[http://www.gotquestions.org/Does-God-exist.html Does God exist?]
| |
| − | *[http://www.AllAboutGOD.com/who-is-God.htm Who is God?]
| |
| − | *[http://sultan.org/articles/god.html God Concept in Islam]
| |
| − | *[http://www.spiritual-happiness.com/spirituality.html Spirituality For Dummies]
| |
| − | *[http://freethought.freeservers.com/reason/rationalview.html Arguments against God, an atheistic perspective]
| |
| − | *[http://www.gotquestions.org/What-is-God-like.html What are the attributes of God?]
| |
| − | * [http://www.AllAboutGod.com/God-o.htm God] A Christian Perspective.
| |
| − | * [http://www.AllAboutPhilosophy.org/God-n.htm God ] A Christian Perspective.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Modified after wikipedias article on God licenced under GNU FDL.
| |
