WikiChristian talk:Village pump - Revision history

Aquatiki: just archive at top

2008-08-03T20:04:17Z

just archive at top

Aquatiki: WikiChristian:Village pump moved to WikiChristian talk:Village pump: discussions go on talk pages

2008-08-03T20:02:06Z

WikiChristian:Village pump moved to WikiChristian talk:Village pump: discussions go on talk pages

Graham grove: Bit neater

2008-07-28T20:06:58Z

Bit neater

RyanCross: /* Bureaucrats and Sysops */ typo

2008-07-26T12:44:55Z

‎Bureaucrats and Sysops: typo

RyanCross: /* Bureaucrats and Sysops */ reply

2008-07-26T12:44:33Z

‎Bureaucrats and Sysops: reply

Graham grove: /* Bureaucrats and Sysops */

2008-07-26T12:37:55Z

‎Bureaucrats and Sysops

RyanCross: +shortcuts

2008-07-26T11:16:52Z

+shortcuts

RyanCross: /* Bureaucrats and Sysops */ reply

2008-07-26T11:03:01Z

‎Bureaucrats and Sysops: reply

Aquatiki: b'crat = bureaucrat

2008-07-26T10:43:41Z

b'crat = bureaucrat

RyanCross: /* Bureaucrats and Sysops */ cmt

2008-07-26T03:17:37Z

‎Bureaucrats and Sysops: cmt

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 # [[WikiChristian:Village pump/Archive 1|Beginning - September 2007]]
 |}
 ==Creating new page and editing==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {| class="infobox" width="315px"
 |-
@@ Line 10: / Line 9: @@
 {{box | text=This page is the main '''discussion forum''' for WikiChristian. Please bring up any technical or organizational topics here. See also: [[Help:Contents]] page.}}
 {{rtoc}}
 '''[http://www.wikichristian.org/index.php?title=Wikichristian:Village_pump&action=edit&section=new Add new post]'''

@@ Line 63: / Line 63: @@
 <-- Ah, I see. That reminds me, may I become a bureaucrat? :) I think I've shown I'm active here. If not, that's certainly fine with me. And don't worry, I have bureaucrat experience. ;) -- [[User:RyanCross|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">Ryan†Cross</font>]] ('''''[[User talk:RyanCross|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">talk</font>]]''''') 04:03, 26 July 2008 (PDT)
 : I think that there should be no problem you being a bureaucrat, but first I reckon I'd like to chat with Prab about bureaucrat rules etc. Also, would you mind perhaps emailing me and Robert and Prab and letting us know about your walk with Jesus and your Christian background. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 05:37, 26 July 2008 (PDT)
-::I'd be very happy to. You may do as you wish. Oh, but there is no problem. The last time I checked, [[Special:Emailuser]] is not working, and it says it's not even a special page, but it is still a blue link. I won't be able to email unless the situation if fixed. -- [[User:RyanCross|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">Ryan†Cross</font>]] ('''''[[User talk:RyanCross|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">talk</font>]]''''') 05:44, 26 July 2008 (PDT)
+::I'd be very happy to. You may do as you wish. Oh, but there is one problem. The last time I checked, [[Special:Emailuser]] is not working, and it says it's not even a special page, but it is still a blue link. I won't be able to email unless the situation if fixed. -- [[User:RyanCross|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">Ryan†Cross</font>]] ('''''[[User talk:RyanCross|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">talk</font>]]''''') 05:44, 26 July 2008 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:44, 26 July 2008
Line 63:		Line 63:
	<-- Ah, I see. That reminds me, may I become a bureaucrat? :) I think I've shown I'm active here. If not, that's certainly fine with me. And don't worry, I have bureaucrat experience. ;) -- [[User:RyanCross\|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">Ryan†Cross</font>]] ('''''[[User talk:RyanCross\|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">talk</font>]]''''') 04:03, 26 July 2008 (PDT)		<-- Ah, I see. That reminds me, may I become a bureaucrat? :) I think I've shown I'm active here. If not, that's certainly fine with me. And don't worry, I have bureaucrat experience. ;) -- [[User:RyanCross\|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">Ryan†Cross</font>]] ('''''[[User talk:RyanCross\|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">talk</font>]]''''') 04:03, 26 July 2008 (PDT)
	: I think that there should be no problem you being a bureaucrat, but first I reckon I'd like to chat with Prab about bureaucrat rules etc. Also, would you mind perhaps emailing me and Robert and Prab and letting us know about your walk with Jesus and your Christian background. --[[User:Graham grove\|Graham grove]] 05:37, 26 July 2008 (PDT)		: I think that there should be no problem you being a bureaucrat, but first I reckon I'd like to chat with Prab about bureaucrat rules etc. Also, would you mind perhaps emailing me and Robert and Prab and letting us know about your walk with Jesus and your Christian background. --[[User:Graham grove\|Graham grove]] 05:37, 26 July 2008 (PDT)
		+	::I'd be very happy to. You may do as you wish. Oh, but there is no problem. The last time I checked, [[Special:Emailuser]] is not working, and it says it's not even a special page, but it is still a blue link. I won't be able to email unless the situation if fixed. -- [[User:RyanCross\|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">Ryan†Cross</font>]] ('''''[[User talk:RyanCross\|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">talk</font>]]''''') 05:44, 26 July 2008 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:37, 26 July 2008
Line 62:		Line 62:
	:::: I think a b'crat is someone with the hand on the wheel, never missing more than 24 hours without signing off to someone else. A b'crat has to power to give and removed adminship. Admins, however, can have seasons of business, come and go. Six months, without written explanation, sounds right to me for them. --[[User:Aquatiki\|Aquatiki]] 03:43, 26 July 2008 (PDT)		:::: I think a b'crat is someone with the hand on the wheel, never missing more than 24 hours without signing off to someone else. A b'crat has to power to give and removed adminship. Admins, however, can have seasons of business, come and go. Six months, without written explanation, sounds right to me for them. --[[User:Aquatiki\|Aquatiki]] 03:43, 26 July 2008 (PDT)
	<-- Ah, I see. That reminds me, may I become a bureaucrat? :) I think I've shown I'm active here. If not, that's certainly fine with me. And don't worry, I have bureaucrat experience. ;) -- [[User:RyanCross\|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">Ryan†Cross</font>]] ('''''[[User talk:RyanCross\|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">talk</font>]]''''') 04:03, 26 July 2008 (PDT)		<-- Ah, I see. That reminds me, may I become a bureaucrat? :) I think I've shown I'm active here. If not, that's certainly fine with me. And don't worry, I have bureaucrat experience. ;) -- [[User:RyanCross\|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">Ryan†Cross</font>]] ('''''[[User talk:RyanCross\|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">talk</font>]]''''') 04:03, 26 July 2008 (PDT)
		+	: I think that there should be no problem you being a bureaucrat, but first I reckon I'd like to chat with Prab about bureaucrat rules etc. Also, would you mind perhaps emailing me and Robert and Prab and letting us know about your walk with Jesus and your Christian background. --[[User:Graham grove\|Graham grove]] 05:37, 26 July 2008 (PDT)

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:02, 3 August 2008
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:16, 26 July 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{shortcut\|[[WC:VP]]<br>[[WC:VILLAGE]]<br>[[WC:PUMP]]}}
	{\| class="infobox" width="315px"		{\| class="infobox" width="315px"
	\|-		\|-

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:03, 26 July 2008
Line 60:		Line 60:
	:::If they do ever come back, they can always ask for the bureaucrat right back. If they do become inactive again, we'll just do it all over again. Do you think we should have a certain amount of time we should remove that right? Maybe, if a bureaucrat isn't active or doesn't edit for 6 months, we remove their rights. Thoughts? -- [[User:RyanCross\|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">Ryan†Cross</font>]] ('''''[[User talk:RyanCross\|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">talk</font>]]''''') 20:17, 25 July 2008 (PDT)		:::If they do ever come back, they can always ask for the bureaucrat right back. If they do become inactive again, we'll just do it all over again. Do you think we should have a certain amount of time we should remove that right? Maybe, if a bureaucrat isn't active or doesn't edit for 6 months, we remove their rights. Thoughts? -- [[User:RyanCross\|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">Ryan†Cross</font>]] ('''''[[User talk:RyanCross\|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">talk</font>]]''''') 20:17, 25 July 2008 (PDT)
	:::: I think a b'crat is someone with the hand on the wheel, never missing more than 24 hours without signing off to someone else. A b'crat has to power to give and removed adminship. Admins, however, can have seasons of business, come and go. Six months, without written explanation, sounds right to me for them. --[[User:Aquatiki\|Aquatiki]] 03:43, 26 July 2008 (PDT)		:::: I think a b'crat is someone with the hand on the wheel, never missing more than 24 hours without signing off to someone else. A b'crat has to power to give and removed adminship. Admins, however, can have seasons of business, come and go. Six months, without written explanation, sounds right to me for them. --[[User:Aquatiki\|Aquatiki]] 03:43, 26 July 2008 (PDT)
		+	<-- Ah, I see. That reminds me, may I become a bureaucrat? :) I think I've shown I'm active here. If not, that's certainly fine with me. And don't worry, I have bureaucrat experience. ;) -- [[User:RyanCross\|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">Ryan†Cross</font>]] ('''''[[User talk:RyanCross\|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">talk</font>]]''''') 04:03, 26 July 2008 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:43, 26 July 2008
Line 59:		Line 59:
	::Thanks for your two-cents Robert. I reckon we should sit down together (well, figuratively speaking) with Prab and work out some ground-rules for being a bureaucrat. All of these technical wiki things like bureaucrats and sysops are things which I didn't really know anything about until the last week or two when I decided to read about them - terrible really isn't it; I guess I've always been so focussed on trying to get content onto WikiChristian that I've neglected some other parts. I reckon it is important to work out (even though WikiChristian is ecumenical and regular editting +/- sysop-ship should be open to all users) if there is some sort of theological specifics that we consider to be essential to be bureaucrat of this site. --[[User:Graham grove\|Graham grove]] 16:33, 25 July 2008 (PDT)		::Thanks for your two-cents Robert. I reckon we should sit down together (well, figuratively speaking) with Prab and work out some ground-rules for being a bureaucrat. All of these technical wiki things like bureaucrats and sysops are things which I didn't really know anything about until the last week or two when I decided to read about them - terrible really isn't it; I guess I've always been so focussed on trying to get content onto WikiChristian that I've neglected some other parts. I reckon it is important to work out (even though WikiChristian is ecumenical and regular editting +/- sysop-ship should be open to all users) if there is some sort of theological specifics that we consider to be essential to be bureaucrat of this site. --[[User:Graham grove\|Graham grove]] 16:33, 25 July 2008 (PDT)
	:::If they do ever come back, they can always ask for the bureaucrat right back. If they do become inactive again, we'll just do it all over again. Do you think we should have a certain amount of time we should remove that right? Maybe, if a bureaucrat isn't active or doesn't edit for 6 months, we remove their rights. Thoughts? -- [[User:RyanCross\|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">Ryan†Cross</font>]] ('''''[[User talk:RyanCross\|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">talk</font>]]''''') 20:17, 25 July 2008 (PDT)		:::If they do ever come back, they can always ask for the bureaucrat right back. If they do become inactive again, we'll just do it all over again. Do you think we should have a certain amount of time we should remove that right? Maybe, if a bureaucrat isn't active or doesn't edit for 6 months, we remove their rights. Thoughts? -- [[User:RyanCross\|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">Ryan†Cross</font>]] ('''''[[User talk:RyanCross\|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">talk</font>]]''''') 20:17, 25 July 2008 (PDT)
		+	:::: I think a b'crat is someone with the hand on the wheel, never missing more than 24 hours without signing off to someone else. A b'crat has to power to give and removed adminship. Admins, however, can have seasons of business, come and go. Six months, without written explanation, sounds right to me for them. --[[User:Aquatiki\|Aquatiki]] 03:43, 26 July 2008 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:17, 26 July 2008
Line 58:		Line 58:
	:Bureaucrat is huge power. I agree that it should be only given with great care and constantly re-evaluated. Adminship, however, is not as vast, so I'll wait to hear from others too. --[[User:Aquatiki\|Aquatiki]] 16:13, 25 July 2008 (PDT)		:Bureaucrat is huge power. I agree that it should be only given with great care and constantly re-evaluated. Adminship, however, is not as vast, so I'll wait to hear from others too. --[[User:Aquatiki\|Aquatiki]] 16:13, 25 July 2008 (PDT)
	::Thanks for your two-cents Robert. I reckon we should sit down together (well, figuratively speaking) with Prab and work out some ground-rules for being a bureaucrat. All of these technical wiki things like bureaucrats and sysops are things which I didn't really know anything about until the last week or two when I decided to read about them - terrible really isn't it; I guess I've always been so focussed on trying to get content onto WikiChristian that I've neglected some other parts. I reckon it is important to work out (even though WikiChristian is ecumenical and regular editting +/- sysop-ship should be open to all users) if there is some sort of theological specifics that we consider to be essential to be bureaucrat of this site. --[[User:Graham grove\|Graham grove]] 16:33, 25 July 2008 (PDT)		::Thanks for your two-cents Robert. I reckon we should sit down together (well, figuratively speaking) with Prab and work out some ground-rules for being a bureaucrat. All of these technical wiki things like bureaucrats and sysops are things which I didn't really know anything about until the last week or two when I decided to read about them - terrible really isn't it; I guess I've always been so focussed on trying to get content onto WikiChristian that I've neglected some other parts. I reckon it is important to work out (even though WikiChristian is ecumenical and regular editting +/- sysop-ship should be open to all users) if there is some sort of theological specifics that we consider to be essential to be bureaucrat of this site. --[[User:Graham grove\|Graham grove]] 16:33, 25 July 2008 (PDT)
		+	:::If they do ever come back, they can always ask for the bureaucrat right back. If they do become inactive again, we'll just do it all over again. Do you think we should have a certain amount of time we should remove that right? Maybe, if a bureaucrat isn't active or doesn't edit for 6 months, we remove their rights. Thoughts? -- [[User:RyanCross\|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">Ryan†Cross</font>]] ('''''[[User talk:RyanCross\|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">talk</font>]]''''') 20:17, 25 July 2008 (PDT)