WikiChristian:Sandbox - Revision history

Scartho77 at 20:03, 25 September 2025

2025-09-25T20:03:28Z

Scartho77 at 19:51, 25 September 2025

2025-09-25T19:51:45Z

Scartho77 at 19:50, 25 September 2025

2025-09-25T19:50:15Z

Scartho77 at 17:10, 3 May 2025

2025-05-03T17:10:32Z

Scartho77 at 17:10, 3 May 2025

2025-05-03T17:10:00Z

Scartho77 at 21:07, 2 May 2025

2025-05-02T21:07:30Z

Scartho77 at 21:02, 2 May 2025

2025-05-02T21:02:48Z

Scartho77 at 18:27, 4 February 2025

2025-02-04T18:27:42Z

Scartho77 at 18:27, 4 February 2025

2025-02-04T18:27:13Z

Scartho77 at 18:26, 4 February 2025

2025-02-04T18:26:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:03, 25 September 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~{\|class=wikitable style="text-align: center;"<!---Formatting was very difficult, and no simpler method than a table was found.--->~~
−	\|"There is no evidence, scientific or otherwise, to support the theory of evolution."<br>Sir Cecil Wakeley KBE CB DSc MCh.<ref>Foreword by Sir Cecil Wakeley to the 1967 book by retired professor H Enoch, "Evolution or Creation", Evangelical Press.</ref> President 1949-1954 of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Editor 1947-1969 Ann R Coll Surg Engl.
−	\|-
−	\|"Should Christians embrace evolution? Our answer is an unequivocal 'no'!"<BR>Hills P and Nevin NC (2009), "Conclusions: Should Christians embrace evolution?".<ref>Nevin, Norman C (Edr) (2009), "Should Christians embrace evolution?", IVP, p220.</ref> [https://history.rcp.ac.uk/inspiring-physicians/norman-cummings-nevin Norman C Nevin OBE] was Emeritus Professor of Medical Genetics at Queen's University, Belfast, and Head of the Northern Regional Genetics Service.
−	\|-
−	\|"We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."<br>Petition signed by about 1150 science PhDs or academics.<ref>"A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism", https://www.discovery.org/m/securepdfs/2025/07/Scientific-Dissent-List-07302025.pdf, downloaded 2025-09-25.</ref>
−	\|}
−
	===TBN===		===TBN===
	#[http://www.tbn.org/watch/tbnlive/tbn56.ram Watch TBN (real - modem)]		#[http://www.tbn.org/watch/tbnlive/tbn56.ram Watch TBN (real - modem)]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 |"Should Christians embrace evolution?  Our answer is an unequivocal 'no'!"<BR>Hills P and Nevin NC (2009), "Conclusions:  Should Christians embrace evolution?".<ref>Nevin, Norman C (Edr) (2009), "Should Christians embrace evolution?", IVP, p220.</ref>  [https://history.rcp.ac.uk/inspiring-physicians/norman-cummings-nevin Norman C Nevin OBE] was Emeritus Professor of Medical Genetics at Queen's University, Belfast, and Head of the Northern Regional Genetics Service.
 |-
-|"We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."  Petition signed by about 1150 science PhDs or academics.<ref>"A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism", https://www.discovery.org/m/securepdfs/2025/07/Scientific-Dissent-List-07302025.pdf, downloaded 2025-09-25</ref>
+|"We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."<br>Petition signed by about 1150 science PhDs or academics.<ref>"A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism", https://www.discovery.org/m/securepdfs/2025/07/Scientific-Dissent-List-07302025.pdf, downloaded 2025-09-25.</ref>
 |}

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:50, 25 September 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{\|class=wikitable style="text-align: center;"<!---Formatting was very difficult, and no simpler method than a table was found.--->
		+	\|"There is no evidence, scientific or otherwise, to support the theory of evolution."<br>Sir Cecil Wakeley KBE CB DSc MCh.<ref>Foreword by Sir Cecil Wakeley to the 1967 book by retired professor H Enoch, "Evolution or Creation", Evangelical Press.</ref> President 1949-1954 of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Editor 1947-1969 Ann R Coll Surg Engl.
		+	\|-
		+	\|"Should Christians embrace evolution? Our answer is an unequivocal 'no'!"<BR>Hills P and Nevin NC (2009), "Conclusions: Should Christians embrace evolution?".<ref>Nevin, Norman C (Edr) (2009), "Should Christians embrace evolution?", IVP, p220.</ref> [https://history.rcp.ac.uk/inspiring-physicians/norman-cummings-nevin Norman C Nevin OBE] was Emeritus Professor of Medical Genetics at Queen's University, Belfast, and Head of the Northern Regional Genetics Service.
		+	\|-
		+	\|"We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged." Petition signed by about 1150 science PhDs or academics.<ref>"A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism", https://www.discovery.org/m/securepdfs/2025/07/Scientific-Dissent-List-07302025.pdf, downloaded 2025-09-25</ref>
		+	\|}
		+
	===TBN===		===TBN===
	#[http://www.tbn.org/watch/tbnlive/tbn56.ram Watch TBN (real - modem)]		#[http://www.tbn.org/watch/tbnlive/tbn56.ram Watch TBN (real - modem)]

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:10, 3 May 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~Romans 7:7-25 is discussed under the similar topic of [[Assurance#Romans_7:7-25\|Assurance]].~~
−
	===TBN===		===TBN===
	#[http://www.tbn.org/watch/tbnlive/tbn56.ram Watch TBN (real - modem)]		#[http://www.tbn.org/watch/tbnlive/tbn56.ram Watch TBN (real - modem)]

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:10, 3 May 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	Romans 7:7-25 is discussed under the similar topic of [[Assurance#Romans_7:7-25\|Assurance]].
		+
	===TBN===		===TBN===
	#[http://www.tbn.org/watch/tbnlive/tbn56.ram Watch TBN (real - modem)]		#[http://www.tbn.org/watch/tbnlive/tbn56.ram Watch TBN (real - modem)]

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:07, 2 May 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~===Imperfection of sanctification in believers===~~
−	~~That is a similar matter. In the Larger Catechism, it is question 78 while assurance is dealt with by questions 80 and 81, nearby.~~
−
−	~~====Romans 7:7-25====~~
−	~~In Romans 7, the apostle considers the old testament law, the law which is holy and just and good—and comments that it stirs up sin. Does that apply to people who are saved?~~
−
−	~~''[https://ccel.org/ccel/calvin/calcom38 Calvin, Commentary on Romans, on Rom 7:14]''~~
−	~~:He [the apostle Paul] then sets before us an example in a regenerate man, in whom the remnants of the flesh are wholly contrary to the law of the Lord, while the spirit would gladly obey it.~~
−
−	~~''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Melanchthon Melanchthon,] [https://archive.org/details/commentaryonroma0000mela Commentary on Romans, p159, on Rom 7:14]]'' <!--- 2nd english edn --->~~
−	:Some mock these things and imagine that Paul is here speaking not about his own person, not about the converted and holy, but about the ungodly. This sophistry must be rejected. David is speaking about himself and about all saints when he says [Ps. 143:2]: "In your sight no man living shall be justified," and when he says [Ps. 51:5]: "Behold, I was conceived in iniquity." Thus Paul is speaking about himself, and he includes all saints by his example. Since this interpretation of Paul has firm and clear testimonies in the Psalms, it is certain that foreign interpretations should not be invented.
−
	===TBN===		===TBN===
	#[http://www.tbn.org/watch/tbnlive/tbn56.ram Watch TBN (real - modem)]		#[http://www.tbn.org/watch/tbnlive/tbn56.ram Watch TBN (real - modem)]

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:02, 2 May 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	===Imperfection of sanctification in believers===
		+	That is a similar matter. In the Larger Catechism, it is question 78 while assurance is dealt with by questions 80 and 81, nearby.
		+
		+	====Romans 7:7-25====
		+	In Romans 7, the apostle considers the old testament law, the law which is holy and just and good—and comments that it stirs up sin. Does that apply to people who are saved?
		+
		+	''[https://ccel.org/ccel/calvin/calcom38 Calvin, Commentary on Romans, on Rom 7:14]''
		+	:He [the apostle Paul] then sets before us an example in a regenerate man, in whom the remnants of the flesh are wholly contrary to the law of the Lord, while the spirit would gladly obey it.
		+
		+	''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Melanchthon Melanchthon,] [https://archive.org/details/commentaryonroma0000mela Commentary on Romans, p159, on Rom 7:14]]'' <!--- 2nd english edn --->
		+	:Some mock these things and imagine that Paul is here speaking not about his own person, not about the converted and holy, but about the ungodly. This sophistry must be rejected. David is speaking about himself and about all saints when he says [Ps. 143:2]: "In your sight no man living shall be justified," and when he says [Ps. 51:5]: "Behold, I was conceived in iniquity." Thus Paul is speaking about himself, and he includes all saints by his example. Since this interpretation of Paul has firm and clear testimonies in the Psalms, it is certain that foreign interpretations should not be invented.

	===TBN===		===TBN===

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:27, 4 February 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	* Reuters. ''[http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6584JX20100609?feedType=RSS&feedName=lifestyleMolt Russia Church wants end to Darwin school "monopoly"].'' Wed Jun 9, 2010. Downloaded Feb 4, 2025.
−

	===TBN===		===TBN===

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:26, 4 February 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	* REUTERS. ''[http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6584JX20100609?feedType=RSS&feedName=lifestyleMolt Russia Church wants end to Darwin school "monopoly"].'' Wed Jun 9, 2010.	+	* REUTERS. ''[http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6584JX20100609?feedType=RSS&feedName=lifestyleMolt Russia Church wants end to Darwin school "monopoly"].'' Wed Jun 9, 2010. Downloaded Feb 4, 2025.