Talk:Mark 2 (overview) - Revision history

Muser at 06:57, 14 May 2007

2007-05-14T06:57:44Z

Ben at 02:39, 9 May 2007

2007-05-09T02:39:25Z

Ben at 02:29, 9 May 2007

2007-05-09T02:29:09Z

Ben at 02:27, 9 May 2007

2007-05-09T02:27:35Z

Ben at 02:13, 9 May 2007

2007-05-09T02:13:55Z

New page

I would like to propose to always add the original Greek word for important terms of the discussed bible passage. When you speak about "logos" we could add "λόγος" in brackets. How do you think about that idea?

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I would like to propose to always add the original Greek word for important terms of the discussed bible passage. When you speak about "logos" we could add "λόγος" in brackets. How do you think about that idea? [[Ben]]
 ----
 As you you know the [[Book of Enoch]] is a non-canonical book of the bible, at least in Western Christianity. Of course, the [[Church Fathers]] knew it, and there are few places in some letters of the NT that refer to this book [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Enoch]. My proposal is to shortly mention about the "pseudepigraphal" character of the book. There might be some young readers who would get confused not finding the book in their bible. [[Ben]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I would like to propose to always add the original Greek word for important terms of the discussed bible passage. When you speak about "logos" we could add "λόγος" in brackets. How do you think about that idea? [[Ben]]
 ----
-As you you know the [[Book of Enoch]] is a non-canonical book of the bible, at least in Western Christianity. Of course, the [[Church Fathers]] knew it, and there are few places in some letters of the NT that refer to this book [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Enoch|wikipedia]]. My proposal is to shortly mention about the "pseudepigraphal" character of the book. There might be some young readers who would get confused not finding the book in their bible. [[Ben]]
+As you you know the [[Book of Enoch]] is a non-canonical book of the bible, at least in Western Christianity. Of course, the [[Church Fathers]] knew it, and there are few places in some letters of the NT that refer to this book [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Enoch]. My proposal is to shortly mention about the "pseudepigraphal" character of the book. There might be some young readers who would get confused not finding the book in their bible. [[Ben]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I would like to propose to always add the original Greek word for important terms of the discussed bible passage. When you speak about "logos" we could add "λόγος" in brackets. How do you think about that idea? [[Ben]]
 ----
-As you you know the [[Book of Enoch]] is a non-canonical book of the bible, at least in Western Christianity. Of course, the [[Church Fathers]] knew it, and there are few places in some letters of the NT that refer to this book [[wikipedia|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Enoch]]. My proposal is to shortly mention about the "pseudepigraphal" character of the book. There might be some young readers who would get confused not finding the book in their bible. [[Ben]]
+As you you know the [[Book of Enoch]] is a non-canonical book of the bible, at least in Western Christianity. Of course, the [[Church Fathers]] knew it, and there are few places in some letters of the NT that refer to this book [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Enoch|wikipedia]]. My proposal is to shortly mention about the "pseudepigraphal" character of the book. There might be some young readers who would get confused not finding the book in their bible. [[Ben]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:27, 9 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	I would like to propose to always add the original Greek word for important terms of the discussed bible passage. When you speak about "logos" we could add "λόγος" in brackets. How do you think about that idea?	+	I would like to propose to always add the original Greek word for important terms of the discussed bible passage. When you speak about "logos" we could add "λόγος" in brackets. How do you think about that idea? [[Ben]]
		+	----
		+	As you you know the [[Book of Enoch]] is a non-canonical book of the bible, at least in Western Christianity. Of course, the [[Church Fathers]] knew it, and there are few places in some letters of the NT that refer to this book [[wikipedia\|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Enoch]]. My proposal is to shortly mention about the "pseudepigraphal" character of the book. There might be some young readers who would get confused not finding the book in their bible. [[Ben]]