Difference between revisions of "Talk:Holy See"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Too many red links: new section) |
Graham grove (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
== Too many red links == | == Too many red links == | ||
Hi there. This article has too many red links... anyone want to help create them? Thanks! -- [[User:RyanCross|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">Ryan†Cross</font>]] ('''''[[User talk:RyanCross|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">talk</font>]]''''') 05:34, 16 August 2008 (PDT) | Hi there. This article has too many red links... anyone want to help create them? Thanks! -- [[User:RyanCross|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">Ryan†Cross</font>]] ('''''[[User talk:RyanCross|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">talk</font>]]''''') 05:34, 16 August 2008 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | : Good point. Not only that, this appears to be a direct copy of the wikipedia article (albeit an old one from 2006 - [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Holy_See&oldid=53755324]). Also it doesn't seem to fit in with the [[WikiChristian:Page Layout|Writing Guide]] which states that: "In general, Information Articles should be written in a manner that makes them clear and easy to understand.". As such I think a complete restart to this article would be worthwhile. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 09:23, 16 August 2008 (PDT) | ||
+ | : I have taken the liberty to restart the article. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 09:31, 16 August 2008 (PDT) |
Latest revision as of 16:31, 16 August 2008
Too many red links
Hi there. This article has too many red links... anyone want to help create them? Thanks! -- Ryan†Cross (talk) 05:34, 16 August 2008 (PDT)
- Good point. Not only that, this appears to be a direct copy of the wikipedia article (albeit an old one from 2006 - [1]). Also it doesn't seem to fit in with the Writing Guide which states that: "In general, Information Articles should be written in a manner that makes them clear and easy to understand.". As such I think a complete restart to this article would be worthwhile. --Graham grove 09:23, 16 August 2008 (PDT)
- I have taken the liberty to restart the article. --Graham grove 09:31, 16 August 2008 (PDT)