Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bible"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by 203.113.13.3 (Talk); changed back to last version by Muser) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Picture== | ==Picture== | ||
Don't be shy about changing the pictures I put on the page. If you can find something better, feel free to change it. --[[User:Mustaphile|Mustaphile]] 04:14, 9 May 2005 (PDT) | Don't be shy about changing the pictures I put on the page. If you can find something better, feel free to change it. --[[User:Mustaphile|Mustaphile]] 04:14, 9 May 2005 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | ==Apocrypha naming convention== | ||
| + | The Roman Catholic term for the books it retains is "dueterocanonical", not apocrypha. The former term is more appropriate because (1) it is the terminology used by the Church and (2) apocrypha has negative connotations as it relates to the debate between the Hebrew and Greek traditions. | ||
Revision as of 08:40, 17 June 2008
Let me know what you all think of the format I used on this page. I was trying to get it to look a bit more organized. Cpark 18:08, 5 Feb 2005 (PST)
The new format looks good. Graham
Picture
Don't be shy about changing the pictures I put on the page. If you can find something better, feel free to change it. --Mustaphile 04:14, 9 May 2005 (PDT)
Apocrypha naming convention
The Roman Catholic term for the books it retains is "dueterocanonical", not apocrypha. The former term is more appropriate because (1) it is the terminology used by the Church and (2) apocrypha has negative connotations as it relates to the debate between the Hebrew and Greek traditions.
