Search results

{{Quote|text=<big>{{Bible verse|Matthew|28|20|lang=WEB}}</big>}} topic_name = Matthew 28:20 |

{{Quote|text=<big>{{Bible verse|Matthew|20|28|lang=WEB}}</big>}} topic_name = Matthew 20:28 |

(There is a note at the Discussion page regarding the use here of wikisource Bible verses.) [https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Bible_(King_James)/John#20:28 John 20:28];

[[Job 20|20]] [[Job 28|28]]

G'day Matthew. Welcome. Thanks for your email. I think the technology pages you suggested : Great work Matthew with the new pages you've created. I enjoyed reading them and look forward

...d the subsequent implications of that design, is a subject inherent to any discussion about the Christian faith. The church, in its broadest application, is a co ...ever defined, is a component of the comprehensive Christian belief and any discussion of it in the Bible cannot be separated from the whole.

subtopics = [[Matthew 26]], [[Mark 16]], [[Luke 24]], [[John 20]]-[[John 21|21]]| ! Matthew

...ed in the one phrase, “of a wife the husband is a head;” and we waived the discussion of this symbolism until the present time. As we have already said, the only ...nts; it is designed that the Church share His rule,--Revelation 1:6; 3:21; 20:4, etc. We are taught that God gave Him "to be Head over all things to the

# [[User talk:Graham grove/Archive 1|Discussion between January 2005 - October 2008]] ...re what to put for Returnto. [[User:Kathleen.wright5|Kathleen.wright5]] 08:28, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

...Its origin can be found in what is called the Eternal Covenant. Hebrews 13:20 says, "May the God of peace, who through the blood of the eternal covenant ...2-16), etc., and in the NT there is the New Covenant (Luke 22:20; Matt. 26:28; Heb. 7:22) that was prophesied in Jer. 31:31-37.

...I love John's theology, although his discourses are somewhat repetitious. Matthew, Mark and Luke are open source, you can discuss Alpha and Omega till Kingdo ...so maybe I won't publish at all. I have to contact the initiator of [[John 20:16]] and get his thoughts about Wikibook possibilities. [[User:Athrash|Athr

...arserFunctions were [[Special:Version|installed]]. --[[User:Prab|Prab]] 02:20, 19 July 2008 (PDT) ...RyanCross|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">talk</font>]]''''') 08:28, 24 July 2008 (PDT)

This page is the main '''discussion forum''' for WikiChristian. Please bring up any technical or organizational ...ts notice for further information. --[[User:Mustaphile|Mustaphile]] 14:11, 20 April 2006 (EDT)

Good to put a face to the name. {{smile}} --[[User:Mustaphile|Mustaphile]] 20:57, 22 May 2005 (PDT) ...hat will be "preachy" but hopefully at least it will be open for dialogue, discussion and rebuttal. I also don't think making this a purely factual Encyclopedia

...p. -- [[User:P.B. Pilhet|P.B. Pilhet]] / [[User talk:P.B. Pilhet|Talk]] 17:28, 13 January 2008 (PST) ...- [[User:P.B. Pilhet|P.B. Pilhet]] / [[User talk:P.B. Pilhet|Talk]] 19:30, 20 May 2008 (PDT)

...ge every Jew understood to be reserved only for [[God]] Almighty ([[Luke 5:20]]). And He said of Himself, "I and the Father are one" ([[Gospel of John]] ...rical confirmations.13 By extension, the other two "Synoptic"14 Gospels of Matthew and Mark, painting essentially similar portraits of Jesus’ ministry, are

...urgess, Laurence Chaderton, John Preston, Anthony Tuckney, Lazarus Seaman, Matthew Poole, Samuel Clarke, Ralph Venning, Thomas Watson, Stephen Charnock, Willi I am not disposed to waste the reader's time by entering into any discussion of the comparative merits of Episcopal and Presbyterian orders, though, of

If you’ve ever entered into a discussion on the canon of Scripture, the issue of Luther’s view inevitably comes up ...y which inevitably affects his understanding of the New Testament canon.” [20]

...in, I will come to you: for I trust to see you in my journey.” (Rom. 15:19-20, 22-23) From this passage, therefore, we clearly see that St. Paul had no k ...Imperial City, the Fathers have with reason given it prerogatives" (Canon 28). Here is nothing said of the Pope's special monopoly of the Apostolicity o