Search results

{{Quote|text=<big>{{Bible verse|Matthew|28|18|lang=WEB}}</big>}} topic_name = Matthew 28:18 |

{{Quote|text=<big>{{Bible verse|Matthew|18|28|lang=WEB}}</big>}} topic_name = Matthew 18:28 |

(There is a note at the Discussion page regarding the use here of wikisource Bible verses.) ....wikisource.org/wiki/Bible_(King_James)/2_Corinthians#6:18 2 Corinthians 6:18];

[[Job 18|18]] [[Job 28|28]]

...d the subsequent implications of that design, is a subject inherent to any discussion about the Christian faith. The church, in its broadest application, is a co ...ever defined, is a component of the comprehensive Christian belief and any discussion of it in the Bible cannot be separated from the whole.

# [[User talk:Graham grove/Archive 1|Discussion between January 2005 - October 2008]] *[[Reference Scripture:Genesis 1:26-31;2:18-24 (KJV)]]

...dation of this great city, and seven kings support her rule (Revelation 17:18). The Woman rules these "heads;" they do not rule her. ...ed in the one phrase, “of a wife the husband is a head;” and we waived the discussion of this symbolism until the present time. As we have already said, the only

subtopics = [[Matthew 26]], [[Mark 16]], [[Luke 24]], [[John 20]]-[[John 21|21]]| ! Matthew

...2-16), etc., and in the NT there is the New Covenant (Luke 22:20; Matt. 26:28; Heb. 7:22) that was prophesied in Jer. 31:31-37. ...said, "With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible" (Matthew 19:26, NIV).

...I love John's theology, although his discourses are somewhat repetitious. Matthew, Mark and Luke are open source, you can discuss Alpha and Omega till Kingdo ...suggested, underline "believers" and leave your comment in the temporary (Discussion Start) section for the record. Even more fitting, it would be from the Aval

This page is the main '''discussion forum''' for WikiChristian. Please bring up any technical or organizational ...imple and easily attainable goal. The completion of First Samuel in the [[Matthew Henry Commentary on the Whole Bible]] article. Please see the [[Wikichristi

--[[User:Prab|Prab]] 02:21, 18 July 2008 (PDT) Cheers. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 13:34, 18 July 2008 (PDT)

...User_talk:WikiSysop getting along so well]. --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 18:00, 22 Mar 2005 (PST)'' ...hat will be "preachy" but hopefully at least it will be open for dialogue, discussion and rebuttal. I also don't think making this a purely factual Encyclopedia

...Opinion articles]] for information about these). --[[User:Muser|Muser]] 22:18, 10 November 2007 (EST) ...p. -- [[User:P.B. Pilhet|P.B. Pilhet]] / [[User talk:P.B. Pilhet|Talk]] 17:28, 13 January 2008 (PST)

...] 10:30); a claim that aroused certain parties to plot His death ([[John 5:18]]; [[John 10]]:30-33). Significantly, a wide array of [[New Testament]] wri ...rical confirmations.13 By extension, the other two "Synoptic"14 Gospels of Matthew and Mark, painting essentially similar portraits of Jesus’ ministry, are

...Church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” (Matt. 16:13-18) It is quite evident from these words of our Lord that He built His Church ...of the LORD: the gates of hell shall not prevail against it (Matt. xviii. 18). Certainly, the mouths of ungodly and heretical men, however bold, however

If you’ve ever entered into a discussion on the canon of Scripture, the issue of Luther’s view inevitably comes up ...ge numbers. The citation above says it was a “list” without page numbers. [18] Also of importance to note is Luther did not treat the four questionable N