Difference between revisions of "Historical accuracy of the Bible"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
{{topics}} | {{topics}} | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | [[Biblical inerrancy]] | |
| + | |||
| + | [[Formation and translation of the Bible]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Historical evidence of Jesus Christ]] | ||
{{opinions}} | {{opinions}} | ||
Revision as of 01:01, 2 September 2007
Synopsis: This question of Biblical historical accuracy sparks great debate. Most evangelical and conservative Christians believe in Biblical inerrancy - indeed, the apostle Paul wrote in 2 Timothy that all scripture is God-breathed. Biblical inerrancy implies that the Bible is without error - however, sometimes the Bible speaks in poetry or with parables - and although great truths are found in these parts, they do not necessarily speak of history. When the Bible does speak of kings and wars and prophets, its accuracy is often backed up by other historical documents and most Christians believe the Bible is historically accurate.
Contents
Related topics
Formation and translation of the Bible
Historical evidence of Jesus Christ
Comments, Personal Articles, Studies and Sermons
Historical accuracy of the Bible (discussion) (For short comments and opinions)
Main article
Is the Bible historically accurate? This is a question that sparks great debate. Most evangelical and conservative Christians believe in Biblical inerrancy - indeed, the apostle Paul wrote in 2 Timothy that all scripture is God-breathed. Belief in biblical inerrancy implies that the Bible is completely accurate - however, sometimes the Bible speaks in poetry or with parables - and although great truths are found in these parts, they do not necessarily speak of history. When the Bible does speak of kings and wars and prophets, its accuracy is often backed up by other historical documents and most Christians believe the Bible is historically accurate.
Quotes
Links
Return to Bible
