Difference between revisions of "Apologetics"
Graham grove (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | ==Synopsis== | |
| − | + | Apologetics is the science of defending Christianity from disproof and derogatory claims. Hence apologists are people who defend Christianity. In the first few centuries of Christianity, the Apologists played a significant role in counteracting unorthodox and heretical teachings. | |
| + | |||
| + | ==Contents== | ||
{{topics}} | {{topics}} | ||
| + | * [[Apologists]] | [[Apologists Index]] | ||
* Apologetics by Reference - [[Apologetics: Genesis|Genesis]] | [[Apologetics: Exodus|Exodus]] | [[Apologetics: Leviticus|Leviticus]] | [[Apologetics: Numbers|Numbers]] | [[Apologetics: Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]] | * Apologetics by Reference - [[Apologetics: Genesis|Genesis]] | [[Apologetics: Exodus|Exodus]] | [[Apologetics: Leviticus|Leviticus]] | [[Apologetics: Numbers|Numbers]] | [[Apologetics: Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]] | ||
* Apologetics by Topic | * Apologetics by Topic | ||
| Line 19: | Line 22: | ||
{{quotes}} | {{quotes}} | ||
| − | + | ==Main article== | |
| + | |||
| + | [[Apologetics]] is the science of defending a line of thought, here [[Christianity]], from disproof and derogatory claims. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Scripture]] encourages each believer to be an apologist | ||
| + | |||
| + | : [But] in your hearts regard [[Christ]] the Lord as [[holy]], always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and respect, having a good conscience, so that, when you are slandered, those who revile your good behavior in Christ may be put to shame. ([[1 Peter 3]]:15-16) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Some contrast apologetics with [[polemics]] as referring to the practice of challenging and refuting doctrinal errors within the religion. In this view, apologetics may be viewed as dialogue to defend [[Christianity]] to non-Christians and polemics as dialogue internal to Christianity to refute error or provide correctives. However, the general (dictionary) meaning of the term 'polemics' centers not on what is being refuted, but on its being controversial -- its root meaning has to do with war. If treated that way, polemics would be known by how the matter is being handled. Apologetics, by its root meaning, would be more of a ''logic''al discourse and a way of explaining a [[truth]], while polemics would be 'fighting words'. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The [[early church fathers]] are sometimes categorized as either polemicists or apologists based on the thrust of their writings. | ||
| + | |||
| + | There are some important considerations for a Christian apologetic of today. (There are others, but these are three.) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===(1) Credibility (true-ness, believability)=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Credibility is the part that answers questions like: | ||
| + | * Is it true? | ||
| + | * How real is it? | ||
| + | * Does this make sense? | ||
| + | * Does it add up to anything, or take us anywhere? | ||
| + | * What contradicts it? | ||
| + | * How useful is it at explaining the way this world is? | ||
| + | |||
| + | These are the big Truth questions. Dealing with these means you have to do a lot of thinking, reading, and researching. There are lots of sources to draw from, because there have been people dealing with these questions since before there was recorded history. The [[Bible]] is still the most trusted source on such matters, but is no longer seen by most people as the authority on them. The whole point of an apologetic is to get the ''non''-believer to change their thinking. To do that, we must deal with people as they are, not as if they think like we do. Apologists must remember that the Bible doesn't 'seal the deal' on anything to non-believers. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===(2) Laudability (or 'praise-worthiness')=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Laudability is not about truth as much as it is about value. To laud something or someone means to praise them, usually about some specific action or stance or accomplishment. Laudability addresses questions like these : | ||
| + | * Would this make me a better person? In what ways can it make me better? | ||
| + | * Would it make my children better than they would otherwise be? | ||
| + | * Can it make the society I live in better than it is? | ||
| + | * Does it bring about a good culture with good values? | ||
| + | * Would it bring about peace, stability, civility, and respect for freedom? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===(3) Viability=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Viability is not about truth or values. If something is viable, it means that it can be done or lived-out on an ongoing basis. It's the "get real" factor, on whether it's "doable". Think here as a ''non''-believer : I can believe something is true, and even think highly of it as an ideal, but I'm unlikely to live my life according to it if I don't think it can be done in a day-to-day way. It becomes nothing more than a utopian dream. Pie-in-the-sky, by-and-by does me no good by itself; I need something I can do reasonably well right here where I live. Is it logical to believe that Christianity is the real way to follow the real God if it has nothing much to do with living in the real world which that real God has made? Viability asks these kind of questions: | ||
| + | * Can I live this way? | ||
| + | * Can I envision what my life would be like if I lived in this faith? | ||
| + | * Will lack of success at it mean that I'm a failure at life? | ||
| + | * Does this play into my addictions and psychological problems, and the lies I tell myself? Can other aspects of this faith help me overcome them? | ||
| + | * Can my family live this way, and can I still do so if they choose not to? | ||
| + | * Are there costs in it that I can't, or don't want, to pay? | ||
| + | * Would I have to live this way alone, or is there a real community of others that can help me live it? | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is where it helps to share about your own [[faith]] experience, which is your own 'viability apologetic'. It helps to see someone else who is actually dealing with the things that I'd have a hard time dealing with. The best logical evidence that it ''can'' be done is that there is someone who ''is'' doing it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Just like a [[theology]] or a [[tradition]] or an [[ideology]], an apologetic ultimately stands or falls on the power of the [[Holy Spirit]], especially as it is lived by the community of followers of Christ in that Spirit, ''and'' of the apologists as part of that community. There is certainly a time for polemics within an apologetic, but when fighting words are the main course it leaves people wondering : 'Where is the '''''[[love]]''''' [[Jesus]] spoke so often about?' According to Jesus Himself, '''love''' is how we are known as His. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Links== | ||
| + | |||
* [http://www.carm.org The Christian Apologetics Research Ministry] | * [http://www.carm.org The Christian Apologetics Research Ministry] | ||
* [http://dmoz.org/Society/Religion_and_Spirituality/Christianity/Apologetics/ Open Directory] | * [http://dmoz.org/Society/Religion_and_Spirituality/Christianity/Apologetics/ Open Directory] | ||
Revision as of 02:33, 17 March 2007
Contents
Synopsis
Apologetics is the science of defending Christianity from disproof and derogatory claims. Hence apologists are people who defend Christianity. In the first few centuries of Christianity, the Apologists played a significant role in counteracting unorthodox and heretical teachings.
Contents
Related topics
- Apologists | Apologists Index
- Apologetics by Reference - Genesis | Exodus | Leviticus | Numbers | Deuteronomy
- Apologetics by Topic
- Atonement
- Buddhism | Islam | Judaism
- Church History Criticism
- God
- Paul - Did Paul invent or change Christianity
- The Trinity
- Textual Criticism - Is the Bible historically accurate
- Women - Is Christianity chauvanistic
Comments, Personal Articles, Studies and Sermons
Apologetics (discussion) (For short comments and opinions)
For related quotations see Apologetics (quotes)
Main article
Apologetics is the science of defending a line of thought, here Christianity, from disproof and derogatory claims.
Scripture encourages each believer to be an apologist
- [But] in your hearts regard Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and respect, having a good conscience, so that, when you are slandered, those who revile your good behavior in Christ may be put to shame. (1 Peter 3:15-16)
Some contrast apologetics with polemics as referring to the practice of challenging and refuting doctrinal errors within the religion. In this view, apologetics may be viewed as dialogue to defend Christianity to non-Christians and polemics as dialogue internal to Christianity to refute error or provide correctives. However, the general (dictionary) meaning of the term 'polemics' centers not on what is being refuted, but on its being controversial -- its root meaning has to do with war. If treated that way, polemics would be known by how the matter is being handled. Apologetics, by its root meaning, would be more of a logical discourse and a way of explaining a truth, while polemics would be 'fighting words'.
The early church fathers are sometimes categorized as either polemicists or apologists based on the thrust of their writings.
There are some important considerations for a Christian apologetic of today. (There are others, but these are three.)
(1) Credibility (true-ness, believability)
Credibility is the part that answers questions like:
- Is it true?
- How real is it?
- Does this make sense?
- Does it add up to anything, or take us anywhere?
- What contradicts it?
- How useful is it at explaining the way this world is?
These are the big Truth questions. Dealing with these means you have to do a lot of thinking, reading, and researching. There are lots of sources to draw from, because there have been people dealing with these questions since before there was recorded history. The Bible is still the most trusted source on such matters, but is no longer seen by most people as the authority on them. The whole point of an apologetic is to get the non-believer to change their thinking. To do that, we must deal with people as they are, not as if they think like we do. Apologists must remember that the Bible doesn't 'seal the deal' on anything to non-believers.
(2) Laudability (or 'praise-worthiness')
Laudability is not about truth as much as it is about value. To laud something or someone means to praise them, usually about some specific action or stance or accomplishment. Laudability addresses questions like these :
- Would this make me a better person? In what ways can it make me better?
- Would it make my children better than they would otherwise be?
- Can it make the society I live in better than it is?
- Does it bring about a good culture with good values?
- Would it bring about peace, stability, civility, and respect for freedom?
(3) Viability
Viability is not about truth or values. If something is viable, it means that it can be done or lived-out on an ongoing basis. It's the "get real" factor, on whether it's "doable". Think here as a non-believer : I can believe something is true, and even think highly of it as an ideal, but I'm unlikely to live my life according to it if I don't think it can be done in a day-to-day way. It becomes nothing more than a utopian dream. Pie-in-the-sky, by-and-by does me no good by itself; I need something I can do reasonably well right here where I live. Is it logical to believe that Christianity is the real way to follow the real God if it has nothing much to do with living in the real world which that real God has made? Viability asks these kind of questions:
- Can I live this way?
- Can I envision what my life would be like if I lived in this faith?
- Will lack of success at it mean that I'm a failure at life?
- Does this play into my addictions and psychological problems, and the lies I tell myself? Can other aspects of this faith help me overcome them?
- Can my family live this way, and can I still do so if they choose not to?
- Are there costs in it that I can't, or don't want, to pay?
- Would I have to live this way alone, or is there a real community of others that can help me live it?
This is where it helps to share about your own faith experience, which is your own 'viability apologetic'. It helps to see someone else who is actually dealing with the things that I'd have a hard time dealing with. The best logical evidence that it can be done is that there is someone who is doing it.
Just like a theology or a tradition or an ideology, an apologetic ultimately stands or falls on the power of the Holy Spirit, especially as it is lived by the community of followers of Christ in that Spirit, and of the apologists as part of that community. There is certainly a time for polemics within an apologetic, but when fighting words are the main course it leaves people wondering : 'Where is the love Jesus spoke so often about?' According to Jesus Himself, love is how we are known as His.
Links
- The Christian Apologetics Research Ministry
- Open Directory
- Christianity Today
- Apologetics Index Apologetics research resources on religious cults, sects, world religions, and related issues.
- Theopedia - Apologetics
Return to Christian doctrine and debates
