Talk:Atheism - Revision history

Atheist Debater at 01:25, 17 January 2011

2011-01-17T01:25:46Z

Atheist Debater at 01:24, 17 January 2011

2011-01-17T01:24:52Z

MatthewClarke: Why I reverted Daniel's recent edits

2010-01-13T19:16:02Z

Why I reverted Daniel's recent edits

Exile at 16:45, 2 February 2005

2005-02-02T16:45:33Z

Exile at 16:51, 1 February 2005

2005-02-01T16:51:55Z

New page

It says "write it in the Atheism section", but it looks like it must've been scoured clear, there's nothing here.

The definition given is plain wrong. There are atheistic religions (notably Buddhism).

Obviously I wouldn't expect a Christian encyclopedia to
go into much depth here but I would expect

- history of atheism
- arguments for atheism
- arguments against atheism
- some discussion of official church attitudes to atheism and atheists
(do they go to hell?)

[[User:Exile|Exile]] 08:51, 1 Feb 2005 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:25, 17 January 2011
Line 21:		Line 21:
	[[User:Exile\|Exile]] 08:45, 2 Feb 2005 (PST)		[[User:Exile\|Exile]] 08:45, 2 Feb 2005 (PST)

		+
		+	Atheist_Debater
	I am a new user, and I came across the atheism article on this site and found it to be quite lacking. I will be focusing on the arguments for and against this position. So far I modified the definition, changed the external links section (conservapedia is not a site anyone should be referred to for educational purposes) and added one argument in favor of atheism, by an actual atheist, not someone straw-manning an argument. I hope to do more soon.		I am a new user, and I came across the atheism article on this site and found it to be quite lacking. I will be focusing on the arguments for and against this position. So far I modified the definition, changed the external links section (conservapedia is not a site anyone should be referred to for educational purposes) and added one argument in favor of atheism, by an actual atheist, not someone straw-manning an argument. I hope to do more soon.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:24, 17 January 2011
Line 20:		Line 20:

	[[User:Exile\|Exile]] 08:45, 2 Feb 2005 (PST)		[[User:Exile\|Exile]] 08:45, 2 Feb 2005 (PST)
		+
		+	I am a new user, and I came across the atheism article on this site and found it to be quite lacking. I will be focusing on the arguments for and against this position. So far I modified the definition, changed the external links section (conservapedia is not a site anyone should be referred to for educational purposes) and added one argument in favor of atheism, by an actual atheist, not someone straw-manning an argument. I hope to do more soon.

	==Reverting recent edits==		==Reverting recent edits==

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:16, 13 January 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:

	[[User:Exile\|Exile]] 08:45, 2 Feb 2005 (PST)		[[User:Exile\|Exile]] 08:45, 2 Feb 2005 (PST)
		+
		+	==Reverting recent edits==
		+	I reverted two edits by [[User:Daniel]] on 12 Jan for the follwoing reasons:
		+	* I don't think the added ideas were valuable, although perhaps the point about intelligent design could be rewritten in the prior section as a reason against atheism.
		+	* The text was poorly written
		+	* I don't think there is such a thing as a "metheologist". If there is, please give some reference to back up the term.
		+	* Don't know why "Daniel" was added as a quote.
		+	[[User:MatthewClarke\|Matt]] 11:16, 13 January 2010 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:45, 2 February 2005
Line 13:		Line 13:

	[[User:Exile\|Exile]] 08:51, 1 Feb 2005 (PST)		[[User:Exile\|Exile]] 08:51, 1 Feb 2005 (PST)
		+
		+
		+	Well then Exile, go ahead and write something about those topics. All of the topics you've mentioned sound worthwhile - but they'll only get there if someone sits down and does some writing (and hopefully research too).
		+
		+	Thanks. Will do. To declare an interest - I am an atheist but will be as objective as I can!
		+
		+	[[User:Exile\|Exile]] 08:45, 2 Feb 2005 (PST)